Same sex marriage Goes Before U.S. Supreme Court

Dire ramifications for South Carolina—and the nation

There is a lot at stake in the case of DeBoer v. Snyder, a lawsuit originally filed by a lesbian couple on January 23, 2012 in Federal District Court challenging Michigan’s ban on same sex marriage. A ruling on March 21, 2014 in Federal District Court overturned the ban, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ban. The DeBoer case, and the issue of whether same sex marriage should be legalized on a national front, has now been appealed—together with three other same-sex cases—to the U.S. Supreme Court. A judgment will likely be handed down in June or July of this year. Suffice it to say, the outcome of this decision will have far-reaching ramifications, one way or the other.

What’s at stake?

The U.S. Supreme Court is the final stop of this highly charged and pivotal case. Many gay and lesbian couples across the country are holding their collective breaths in anticipation of an ultimate verdict. “The magnitude of this decision can not be overstated,” says Columbia attorney, Carrie Warner, who made history in South Carolina by challenging—and overturning the state’s ban on same sex marriages. “A win by gay couples contesting the state bans on same sex marriage will mean that all states must recognize the marriages of all gay couples anywhere. A defeat would essentially nullify all legally contracted gay marriages in the nation and wreak havoc on couples that have filed federal and state tax returns together, or named their spouses as beneficiaries on retirement plans, or provided health insurance for their spouse, and so on.”

Bottom line

To put it simply, a defeat in the U.S. Supreme Court would essentially reverse the financial and federal entitlements of millions of couples who, as of today, are recognized as legally married in their respective state. The oral arguments in the Supreme Court case will begin on April 28, 2015, a date that many are looking forward to with equal parts hope and dread. “There’s really no middle ground here,” says Ms. Warner. “The decision will impact countless lives. Obviously we hope the Supreme Court will strike down these marriage bans, thus validating same sex marriages in states all across the country.”

What’s your opinion on this pivotal case?

Let us here from you. We want to know what you think about this important case. How do you think the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on this matter? What do you think the decision should be? Will you or your loved ones be affected?

Ready to get started?

Meet Carrie Warner

warner law firm

Our Latest Blog and Insights

What the Scherba Decision Means for Your South Carolina Divorce Case

Recently, we had a successful appeal come from the South Carolina Court of Appeals involving alimony. It also discussed stock-based compensation and how it is to be treated in divorce cases. In Scherba v. Scherba, (Opinion No. 6128, filed March 18, 2026), the Court of Appeals reviewed a divorce involving a husband who had worked […]

When States Compete Over Your Child: Breaking Down Shoemaker v. Thacher

Sometimes a case comes along that we believe every parent should understand, even if it never makes the evening news. Allison Shoemaker v. Zachary Thacher is one of those cases. It is a favorable opinion we received from the South Carolina Court of Appeals that shines a bright light on interstate custody disputes between parents. […]

Trusts in South Carolina Divorce: Are Trust Assets Divided?

When high-asset marriages end, the division of property often involves complex financial instruments, with trusts being among the most contested. A common misconception is that placing assets into a trust automatically shields them from the family court’s reach. In South Carolina, the reality of equitable distribution is far more nuanced. Family court judges do not […]

Find Exceptional Counsel

Clarity begins with a conversation…let’s talk.

Get Started Today

Get in Touch

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship, and that the information you provide is not confidential or privileged until an attorney-client relationship is established in writing — please do not include highly sensitive details. You also consent to be contacted by phone, email, or text about your inquiry. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.